Charles Beard's An Economic Meaning of the U. S Constitution
Charles Beard's book, An Economic Interpretation of the U. T. Constitution, was published in 1913 and soon became one of the most debatable literary works of the time. Beard's main thesis in this publication is essentially that the Founding Fathers chose the specific format with the Constitution states to protect all their personal financial interests. Facial beard then procedes argue that the Constitution was written by a great " eliteвЂќ attempting to protect their own property and financial status. Beard was broadening on Carl L. Becker's thesis of sophistication conflict. Inside the eyes of Beard, the Constitution was created by the Founding Fathers being a " countertop revolutionвЂќ that ran against the wishes of farmers and laborers.
Beard's theory and his publication of the book were so questionable because it seemed to demean the Constitution and everything this stood to get, which angered politicians and many of the legal community, in least those who didn't ignore it completely. However , various historians and history professors seemed to identify it and accept this. Many individuals were angered simply by Beard's theory because, mainly because it disparaged the Constitution and Founding Fathers, it seemed to put down every thing our country stands for. Taking a sacred part of history that started our nation and trampling into it by saying it was just rich men trying to save their bank accounts and put over the common person is bound to annoyed more than just a few people.
One of Beard's main experts of the twentieth century is a man named Forrest McDonald. McDonald uses his examine of the voting habits and financial and economic concerns of the delegates at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia to prove that their particular motives were not financial-based. This individual asserts that the majority of the delegates who had public securities had been Antifederalists. This individual concludes his study by saying, " Anyone wishing to rewrite the history of...